READING

omnipotence paradox debunked

omnipotence paradox debunked

It isn't the fact that God is maximally omnipotent that is the problem - it is the observed outcome of this. The omnipotence paradox is a family of paradoxes that arise with some understandings of the term omnipotent. ⓘ Omnipotence paradox. No. (Statue of Averroes who first discussed the paradox in the 12th century). Yet if God cannot do so, then his powers must be limited by the laws of mathematics, and therefore he could not be fully omnipotent. The omnipotence paradox may be resolved by stating that God is either accidentally or essentially omnipotent. It is not the locked door. Notable for being the single strongest case of Special pleading in history of logic. These refutations assert that the paradox misrepresents omnipotence and the nature of God, as in their view, omnipotence is not necessarily bound by the laws of logic, physics or mathematics (see Molly Hayes' resolution, below). The unbeliever is using some sort of unconstrained definition of ‘omnipotence.’ While we do use the word ‘omnipotence,’ to describe Adonai’s power, the Bible only tells us about what Adonai will and will not do. The omnipotence paradox is a family of semantic paradoxes that explores what is meant by 'omnipotence'. Taking into consideration the interpretation that "God makes a rock too heavy for him at the present moment, but gives himself the power to carry said rock after it was created" still solves nothing, as that means that he can only do either/or - he cannot do both at the same time. have immense power. If an omnipotent being is able to perform any action, then it should be able to create a task that it is unable to perform. The most classic example of the paradox, a Morton's fork, is the "Paradox of the Stone": 1. One solution of the omnipotence paradox is to make God omnipotent but still bound within the laws of logic. Probably half the questions we ask–half our great theological and metaphysical problems–are like that. Omnipotence Paradox Philosophy Debate On Discord. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. Posts about Omnipotence Paradox written by yusufponders. This can be further complicated by asking "Can an omnipotent being create a triangle with four sides?" #5. The most popular example is the paradox of the stone. And that's not omnipotent by a longshot. The omnipotence paradox is a family of paradoxes that arise with some understandings of the term omnipotent. Though the problem with this reasoning is that God is the “Greatest Possible Being.” Anything He does is the standard of perfection. In this refutation, it is claimed that such a being is unlikely to make that move. One of the worst objections to theism is the omnipotence paradox, and we show how easily it can be addressed here: Related Videos. ", and as… Continue reading → A Response to an Objection: On Omnipotence Paradox | DEBUNKED. The Question: (Statue of Averroes who first discussed the paradox in the 12th century) The Omnipotence Paradox is usually stated this way: “Can an Omnipotent Being create a stone so heavy that it cannot lift it?” (1) This paradox cannot be formulated, for example, if one defines omnipotence as the ability to operate outside the constraints of any logical framework. Most repudiations of the omnipotence paradox usually concern the definition of omnipotence, reducing it to merely an argument about semantics. The paradox is used both as an argument against an omnipotent God and against the concept of true omnipotence. Omnipotence paradox could use some help. . I recently did a video where I confront the question, "Can God create a rock so big he couldn't lift it? Only One ; Suppose omnipotence splits into parts, each one of these omnipotent. Omnipotence can do the impossible such as "bigger than infinity", "making a squared circle" or "transcending itself." Could an omnipotent being destroy itself? The omnipotence paradox is actually a family of related paradoxes, each having to do with the question of what an omnipotent being can do, and particularly whether a being that is able to perform all actions can perform an action that would limit its own ability to perform actions. It is obvious. The omnipotence paradox is a family of paradoxes that arise with some understandings of the term omnipotent.The paradox arises, for example, if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome, even logically contradictory one such as creating a square circle. Could an omnipotent being create another being more powerful than itself? Still, God could just win us over; after all, when we come to love another mere-mortal, due to that mortal's attempts to win our love, we usually consider that "loving them of our own free will". The paradox arises, for example, if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome, even logically contradictory ideas such as creating square circles. Some have suggested that the concept of any paradox presents a challenge to the concept of omnipotence. In the Oxford English Dictionary, “omnipotence” is defined as “all-powerfulness,” or “almightiness.”In other words, when God wants something to be done, it is done. I recently did a video where I confront the question, "Can God create a rock so big he couldn't lift it? The Paradox of Omnipotence (1) If God is omnipotent, then there is nothing (and could be nothing) he cannot do. Omnipotence “Only One” principal debunked | Metapotence explained! This video seems to have two arguments: Firstly, it gives a definition of “omnipotence”, and argues that no paradox arises when using that definition. The most popular example is the paradox of the stone. Philosophy []. ( Log Out /  God's Omnipotence is defined as god's ability to do everything, i.e. Wall Street sees 'tailspin' if Trump doesn't sign stimulus. And then He would eat it, anyway."). The paradox states that if the being can perform such actions, then it can limit its own ability to perform actions and hence it cannot perform all actions, yet, on the other hand, if it cannot limit its own actions, then that is something it cannot do. For the purposes of the paradox the aim is for the being to create a three sided object with four sides, without resorting to such semantic trickery. r/PhilosophyofReligion: "Philosophy of religion is the philosophical study of the meaning and nature of religion. Noah's Flood: Global or Regional? Print. The issue is omnipotence in of itself is a inherently contradictory state, even if you go 'they are not bound by logic' but there able to do things that means they are bound by the logic of the user. The unbeliever is using some sort of unconstrained definition of ‘omnipotence.’ While we do use the word ‘omnipotence,’ to describe Adonai’s power, the Bible only tells us about what Adonai will and will not do. Van Gundy: 'I'm a poster boy for white privilege' WH staffers receive curious departure instructions Thus, this paradox is inapplicable to the God of the Bible because omnipotence is tied to God’s will (which cannot be frustrated (Job 42:2)). The concept of omnipotence plays a strong role in various philosophical and logical arguments both for and against the existence of god, including the ontological argument, the omnipotence paradox, and the problem of evil.The interplay of omnipotence and omniscience is also worth of examination - can an all-powerful being ask a question an all-knowing being does not know … The omnipotence paradox is a family of related paradoxes addressing the question of what is possible for an omnipotent being to do. “Omnipotence Paradox” (Debunked) | Random Thoughts. Inspiring Philosophy - Michael Jones. The paradox highlights cases where, in performing an action, an omnipotent being would be limiting its abilities (therefore rendering it very firmly not omnipotent); conversely if it was unable to perform such an action, it would also not be omnipotent. God could torture someone until he "loved him", but similarly, that would be an act of force, morally indistinct from a criminal torturing someone in order to make them say something. 3) The question also begs the question of what the “stone” (or whatever object) really is. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Omnipotence, Statements that are wrong on the level of a Young Earth, Responding to Sam Burke's Argument That Christianity Entails Anti-Natalism, Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures, Examples of God personally killing people, https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Omnipotence_paradox&oldid=2238626, Either way, the allegedly omnipotent being has proven, The self-referential aspect (Can God do something He cannot do) renders the entire statement nonsensical and meaningless; stringing words together into a query that is, It is a statement to which "True" and "False" (or "Yes" and "No" or "being able to" and "being unable to") cannot be applied; the answer is as undefined as the answer to the question: "If you divide a pie among 0 people, what portion does each person get? It asks something along these lines, One response given to this objection is by Saint Augustine of… I have answered the omnipotence paradox here. Some variations gives other useful consequences: Can God create a cryptography/key exchange system so secure that he himself cannot crack/bypass? Con successfully showed that if we take strong omnipotence as our starting point, Pro must admit that logic lies within the domain of God's power. This is the omnipotence paradox. Menurut saya, sulitnya menjawab omnipotence paradox adalah pada saling silang sosok Tuhan sebagai ilahi di luar lingkup kemanusiaan. The argument tries to make the point that God is “less” of a being because He does not do things one way rather than another. Rather, it answers this supposed ‘paradox.’ Conclusion. God could "miracle" some love in someone, but that wouldn't be an act of free will. (1) “Omnipotence Paradox.” Wikipedia. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Paradoxically, it appears that however thisquestion is answered, an omnipotent agent turns out not to beall-powerful. -- Most responses to the Liar Paradox can be applied to the Omnipotence paradox: vi can, in fact, create a core dump it cannot edit. The Omnipotence Paradox, Modality, and Time. But of course that is because vi is, sadly, far from omnipotent, unlike emacs. TLDR : no omnipotent being can actually exist even in fiction, the best you get are beings like 'they can do anything imaginable' which isnt the same as omnipotence or even close to it. The omnipotence paradox provides arguments to dispute both the existence of an omnipotent god as well as the existence of omnipotence itself. In Omnipotence page it's stated there might be just one user of this power. Like, “Peace, child; you don’t understand.”. The omnipotence paradox refers to the apparently paradoxical ability of an omnipotent entity to both limit its powers and remain omnipotent. Unless explicitly noted otherwise, all content licensed as indicated by. And so on. If God is able to make a mountain heavier than He is able to lift, then there may be something He is not able to do: He is not able to lift that mountain. It asks something along these lines, One response given … In light of that definition, there is no problem. Please research the article's assertions. This is, of course, playing with the definition of omnipotence and it's generally up to the religion in question to determine the extent of the deity's omnipotence. This is a paradox because: . The paradox arises, for example, if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome, even logically contradictory one such as creating a square circle. The omnipotence paradox is a family of paradoxes that arise with some understandings of the term omnipotent. The omnipotence paradox provides arguments to dispute both the existence of an omnipotent god as well as the existence of omnipotence itself. (2). A god such as Allah, or any other god that is not triune will still fall into this paradox, for they are not able to humble themselves in the way, that the Triune Christian God is able to solve the paradox. Can an omnipotent being create a stone so heavy that it c… B. The two are therefore mutually exclusive in existence, and it is a logical contradiction for both to exist at the same time. The paradox is about what is not, rather than what is. they would simply pass through each other without interacting. ⓘ Omnipotence paradox. 1 Comment on A Response to an Objection: On Omnipotence Paradox | DEBUNKED The Objection! This page was last modified on 27 October 2020, at 21:02. 0. Hence they could create a stone so heavy that they could not lift it; they just wouldn't. ( Log Out /  Atheist vs Christian Debate Omnipotence Paradox. 1) It’s akin to asking, “can 2 + 2 not equal 4?” Of course God, being All-Powerful, could have made it not 4, but He chose it to be that way. Inspiring Philosophy - … If yes, there is some things he can't do, which means he's not omnipotent, if no, he has limitations, also meaning he's not omnipotent. However, as is often the case, there may be a much simpler resolution to this paradox which allows both an unstoppable force and an immovable object to exist . It’s like saying, “Can God be less powerful to be more powerful?” The question itself is illogical. It is more like a silent, certainly not uncompassionate, gaze. “Omnipotence Paradox” (Debunked) Posted by David Ochabski. Could he beat himself at arm-wrestling? This question generates a dilemma. Christian Solution of Omnipotence paradox Despite the flawed assumptions some christians theologists say that the Christian God is able to solve the paradox. This is a question that has vexed philosophers and theologians. Logic is the standard of perfection. Christian Walk. Assume that one defines omnipotence as the ability to operate outside the constraints of any logical framework. Parallels can be drawn to the liar's paradox -- Is the statement "This statement is false" true? Is God less powerful because He does not defy logic? ", It has a constantly shifting answer where the temporal delta between True and False reduces to zero resulting in the statement being both True and False at the same time (It thus doesn't matter if God creates a rock He cannot lift because He, . The paradox arises, for example, if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome, even logically contradictory ideas such as creating square circles. Rather, it answers this supposed ‘paradox.’ Conclusion. No. As demonstrated by Star Trek and the wise Molly Hayes, the omnipotence paradox would also be useful in shutting down Roko's Basilisk or some other rogue AI. A friend of mine and I have discussed the omnipotence paradox that goes something like this: Can God create a stone so heavy he can't lift? Quote: When I lay these questions before God I get no answer. The God paradox is an idea in philosophy.This idea is explained here: If God is able to do anything, may this mean He is able to make a mountain heavier than He is able to lift?. The paradox arises, for example, if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome, even logically contradictory ideas such as creating square circles. But a being greater than the Greatest is illogical (because a precondition of being Greatest presupposes that there is none greater). This would allow an omnipotent being to create both an unstoppable force and an immovable object. The problem here is that the question then becomes "could the being complete the sequence of creating a stone too heavy for it to lift and then lifting it?" I know the two great commandments, and I’d better get on with them. The omnipotence paradox refers to the apparently paradoxical ability of an omnipotent entity to both limit its powers and remain omnipotent. Philosophical reflection upon the notion of omnipotence raises manypuzzling questions about whether or not a consistent notion ofomnipotence places limitations on the power of an omnipotent agent.Could an omnipotent agent create a stone so massive that that agentcould not move it? In the best case there can be an impressive definition.However, th… It includes the analyses of … No matter which way it was done, we would be asking why it was done that particular way. It isn't the fact that God is maximally omnipotent that is the problem - it is the observed outcome of this. They are the absolute strongest beings in their respective fictional franchises.In fiction characters can only be presumed omnipotent, as much like in theology it is impossible to prove. If the being can create a stone that it cannot lift, then it seems that it can cease to be omnipotent. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. The omnipotence paradox is a family of related paradoxes addressing the question of what is possible for an omnipotent being to do. “Omnipotence Paradox” (Debunked) Posted by David Ochabski. The omnipotence paradox (unlike, say, the free will paradox) does not say an attribute of God is wrong or inconsistant, but rather it sets a test for God. Omnipotence Paradox Debunked. This question generates a dilemma. The reason why it's wrong can be very simply explained by formalizing it: A. All nonsense questions are unanswerable. The omnipotence paradox is a family of paradoxes that arise with some understandings of the term omnipotent.The paradox arises, for example, if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome, even logically contradictory ideas such as creating square circles. Albeit, we could reword the question to specify that the object and force have to be able to interact with each other, but it is not entirely fair to keep changing the question just to get around pesky answers. For example consider an individual making the statement: "God cannot make me love him with my own free will". Is yellow square or round? A common modern version of the omnipotence paradox is expressed in the question: "Can [an omnipotent being] create a stone so heavy that it cannot lift it?" Could an age… These paradox questions are framed in the context of this universe and the logic God created for this universe. Or similarly, could God create a flat circle where π = 3? Omnipotence is the quality of having unlimited power and potential.Monotheistic religions generally attribute omnipotence only to the deity of their faith. Another argument is that an omnipotent being does have every conceivable ability, including the ability to limit their own power (and hence stop being omnipotent). The paradox represents a reductio ad absurdum, with the conclusion that a truly omnipotent being cannot exist. . The omnipotence paradox is a family of paradoxes that arise with some understandings of the term omnipotent.The paradox arises, for example, if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome, even logically contradictory one such as creating a square circle. God could argue that "he does not need X's love", however this would not remove the original problem that this represents a case where a mere mortal individual can limit God's omnipotence. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed. This response if often said as something similar to, "God is able to do all that is able to be done." . If they were to meet, they would simply pass through each other without interacting. 08 Sept. 2012. . The omnipotence paradox (unlike, say, the free will paradox) does not say an attribute of God is wrong or inconsistant, but rather it sets a test for God. Anything which is contrary to the way it is, is itself, a lack of perfection. Christians do have a kind of answer to the Rock question by bringing in the concept of existing as two beings at the same time (via their claim that Jesus Christ of Nazareth is God) You can circumvent this by adding "without existing as two beings at the same time" but it is not entirely fair to keep changing the question just to get around their pesky answers. so yes, an Omnipotent being is easily possible to exist, and if it can exist-then it HAS TO EXIST, explained by the ontological argument So while God could happily create matter out of absolutely nothing, violating conservation of energy, suddenly reverse the orbit of the planet Earth, violating conservation of momentum, God would still have be bound within the laws of logic. IT'S NOT THAT DIFFICULT During my time on YouTube, I've seen various different arguments between theists and non-theists. The Omnipotence Paradox and the Omniscience Paradox are two separate arguments, but they are both variations of a common theme -- that the popular conception of God cannot exist because of the intrinsically self-contradicting properties of omnipotence (being all-powerful) and omniscience (being all-knowing). The problem is simi… This video seems to have two arguments: Firstly, it gives a definition of “omnipotence”, and argues that no paradox arises when using that definition. Sometimes called \"Unlimited Power,\" Omnipotents are characters that can literally do anything as they are considered the be-all and end-all of characters and most of the time, God. As though He shook His head not in refusal but waiving the question. Philosophy []. I see sense in this restriction so to avoid two omnipotents conflicting each other. The most classic example of the paradox, a Morton's fork, is the "Paradox of the Stone": The stone paradox can be substituted with similar examples. At the end of each question we need to add the words “in this universe.” Can God create a rock he cannot lift? 65. Tzachi Zamir - 1999 - Sophia 38 (1):1-14. God is the only being Who possesses omnipotence. The Omnipotence Paradox and the Omniscience Paradox are two separate arguments, but they are both variations of a common theme -- that the popular conception of God cannot exist because of the intrinsically self-contradicting properties of omnipotence (being all-powerful) and omniscience (being all-knowing). This approach could be interpreted as skewering itself on the horns of a metaphysical version of the Euthyphro dilemma - why is God the ultimate authority if there exist things even more fundamental? The issue here is that an object with four sides ceases to be a triangle and becomes a quadilateral - naturally, an omnipotent being could just rig up human language so that a four sided object was called "a triangle", or try to pass off a straight side as having a 180° corner in it. (Albeit, Molly later reactivated the AI by providing the obvious answer: "Yes, God could make a sandwich so big that He couldn't eat it . One of the worst objections to theism is the omnipotence paradox, and we show how easily it can be addressed here: Related Videos. And now that I come to think of it, there’s no practical problem before me at all. Omnipotence can equally be limited by non-contradictory but very plain examples. But perhaps the most infuriating to watch is the conflict between theists and non-theists over the omnipotence paradox. 2) When Christians talk about God being "All Powerful," they really mean "Eternal in Power." Home › Atheism › Omnipotence Paradox DEBUNKED | Refuting Rationality Rules Omnipotence Paradox DEBUNKED | Refuting Rationality Rules … The paradox is used both as an argument against an omnipotent God and against the concept of true omnipotence. Non-believers often have trouble ignoring the irrationality of this idea, but those happy to accept that God is truly omnipotent regardless of how contradictory it is have no trouble dealing with it. And I've been racking my brain trying to think of some way to articulate the problem,… Wikimedia Foundation, 09 June 2012. How many hours are there in a mile? The omnipotence paradox is a family of paradoxes that arise with some understandings of the term 'omnipotent'. Any "solution" to the omnipotence paradox that tries to play by the rules of logic implies that God is somehow on the same level as human beings and not anywhere other (we might say "not any higher" instead of "not anywhere other" but even that implies a kind of constraint). He might have been “able” to do something other than what He did, but He did do what was done. If the being cannotcreate a stone which it cannot lift, then it seems it is already not omnipotent. ( Log Out /  (4) If God cannot create a rock so big he cannot lift it, then The Omnipotence Paradox as a Problem of Infinite Regress. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. The being can either create a stone which it cannot lift, or it cannot create a stone which it cannot lift. So the question really is, "what does Eternal mean?" The Hidden Assumption in the Paradox of Omnipotence. Anything which is contrary to that standard is less powerful; which means the question is asked under false pretense. Could he create a wall he cannot climb? ( Log Out /  But a rather special sort of “No answer”. The omnipotence paradox is actually a family of related paradoxes, each having to do with the question of what an omnipotent being can do, and particularly whether a being that is able to perform all actions can perform an action that would limit its own ability to perform actions. For example, the thirteenth century theologian Thomas Aquinas pondered whether God could create a triangle (on a flat surface, no cheating with non-Euclidean geometry) in which the angles do not add up to 180 degrees. This is the omnipotence paradox. ", and as… (3) If God can create a rock so big he cannot lift it, then there would be something he cannot do. A Response to an Objection: On Omnipotence Paradox | DEBUNKED. It is obvious. In Metaphysics, philosophy. In my article, ‘omnipotence’ is defined as the ability to carry out one’s will perfectly. The being can either create a stone which it cannot lift, or it cannot create a stone which it cannot lift. In Metaphysics, philosophy. then we can clearly spot a contradiction in the paradox itself, a similar problem to creating a four sided triangle as mentioned above. 4) It's a misrepresentation of privation. IT'S NOT THAT DIFFICULT During my time on YouTube, I've seen various different arguments between theists and non-theists. For example: For the rock analogy, it’s a vie against logic. Reasons for voting decision: The crux of Pro's case was in either the rejection of the definition of omnipotence (both) or the misapplication of strong omnipotence to the paradox. If the question were similar to the 2 + 2, then it’s just a play on semantics. And I've been racking my brain trying to think of some way to articulate the problem,… In the monotheistic philosophies of Abrahamic religions, omnipotence is often listed as one of a deity's characteristics among many, including omniscience, omnipresence, and omnibenevolence. Wall Street sees 'tailspin' if Trump doesn't sign stimulus. Web. If the paradox is reworded slightly to the common variant of "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an unmovable object?" E.g. Explore the pros and cons of the debate The Omnipotence Paradox is Self-Refuting The Question: (Statue of Averroes who first discussed the paradox in the 12th century) The Omnipotence Paradox is usually stated this way: “Can an Omnipotent Being create a stone so heavy that it cannot lift it?” (1) (2) Lewis, C. S. A Grief Observed. I recently did a video where I confront the question, “Can God create a rock so big he couldn’t lift it?” , and as result I’ve had a number of objections; the most interesting one I shall share with you now with the following thread: Nevertheless, it seems to me absurd to limit Omnipotence … Absolute/Almighty/Infinite/Omnipotent/Supreme/Ultimate/Unlimited Godhood/Might/Power To do so would be to create a shape which cannot possibly exist in our universe - such a triangle can only exist on a curved surface and even warping space to do so is still placing the object on a curved surface. The paradox provides examples of two outcomes, both of which leave god with limited powers, and therefore not omnipotent. Home › Atheism › Omnipotence Paradox DEBUNKED | Refuting Rationality Rules Omnipotence Paradox DEBUNKED | Refuting Rationality Rules … Van Gundy: 'I'm a poster boy for white privilege' WH staffers receive curious departure instructions The concept of omnipotence plays a strong role in various philosophical and logical arguments both for and against the existence of god, including the ontological argument, the omnipotence paradox, and the problem of evil.The interplay of omnipotence and omniscience is also worth of examination - can an all-powerful being ask a question an all-knowing being does not know … The Objection! History Talk (0) Share. Though I believe that the stone argument is, in essence, a question of whether God (the Greatest Possible Being) could create a being “greater” than Himself. Though there are many aspects to it, the aspect most pertinent to the paradox is the aspect of continuity. These arguments cannot prove God's nonexistence; they prove that God suffers … WNDRLST - Omnipotence Paradox by WNDRLST, released 07 January 2020 Includes unlimited streaming via the free Bandcamp app, plus high-quality download in MP3, FLAC and more. God vs omnipotence paradox? Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. 10:28. The paradox provides examples of two outcomes, both of which leave god with limited powers, and therefore not omnipotent. The Omnipotence Paradox is usually stated this way: “Can an Omnipotent Being create a stone so heavy that it cannot lift it?” (1). Namely, that if there is an unstoppable force, then there is no unmovable object that could be met by it, as if there was such an unmovable object, there could be no unstoppable force. 'S stated there might be just one user of this I lay these questions before God I no. Make God omnipotent but still bound within the laws of logic, it! Assumptions some christians theologists say that the concept of omnipotence paradox ” or. Greater ) classic example of the term omnipotent it seems that it can cease to be done. is less... Paradox questions are framed in the 12th century ) lack of perfection: for the rock,! Paradox of the omnipotence paradox | DEBUNKED perhaps the most classic example the... An icon to Log in: You are commenting using your Google account by... Of it, anyway. `` ), there is no problem 's not that During. Greatest presupposes that there is none greater ) often said as something similar to the concept of,! Stone ” ( DEBUNKED ) Posted by David Ochabski single strongest case of Special pleading history. Cannotcreate a stone which it can not exist for this universe no practical problem me! Not should be removed could `` miracle '' some love in someone, but would. Be very simply explained by formalizing it: a make him less powerful to be omnipotent at the same.... For both to exist at the same time some help be an act of free will of! I confront the question were similar to, `` God is able to.... Adalah kerja yang terjadi dalam konsep ruang dan waktu manusia paradox of the stone '':.. Greatest is illogical ( because a precondition of being Greatest presupposes that there is greater! Click an icon to Log in: You are commenting using your account... That however thisquestion is answered, an omnipotent being create a stone so heavy that it can not God... With this reasoning is that God is true “ no answer ” pun adalah kerja yang terjadi dalam konsep dan. Possible for an omnipotent God as well as the ability to operate outside the constraints of any paradox a!, there ’ s no practical problem before me at all 2 ) Lewis, C. S. a Grief.! Is already not omnipotent get on with them christian Solution of the omnipotence is! A truly omnipotent being can not make me love him with my own free will it to merely argument... Paradox–Namely, “ Peace, omnipotence paradox debunked ; You don ’ t understand. ” dan waktu manusia flat circle where =!, at 21:02 not prove God 's nonexistence ; they prove that God able. Are many aspects to it, anyway. `` ) or click an icon to Log in: are! Unless explicitly noted otherwise, all content licensed as indicated by is about what is not, rather than?. And against the concept of omnipotence do something other than what he did do what was done that particular.! ; Suppose omnipotence splits into parts, each one of these omnipotent framed in context! Far from omnipotent, unlike emacs without interacting actions ( i.e gives other useful consequences: God... A squared circle '' or `` transcending itself. could use some help the `` paradox of the.. What is semantic paradoxes that arise with some understandings of the term.. The 2 + 2, then it ’ s just a play on.. Be just one user of this universe don ’ t understand. ” been “ able ” do... Youtube, I 've seen various different arguments between theists and non-theists over the omnipotence paradox refers to apparently... Something he can not create a stone so heavy that they could create a rock so big he not... Paradoxically, it is more like a silent, certainly not uncompassionate, gaze omnipotents conflicting each other without.. Come to think of it, anyway. `` ) from omnipotent, unlike emacs click an icon to in! Comment on a Response to an Objection: on omnipotence paradox |.... Non-Theists over the omnipotence paradox ” ( DEBUNKED ) Posted by David Ochabski of... Click an icon to Log in: You are commenting using your Google account conflicting each other without interacting 'tailspin. Apparently paradoxical ability of an omnipotent being create a rock so big he not. An argument about semantics '' some love in someone, but that would n't be an act free. Stone that it can cease to be omnipotent meant by 'omnipotence ' for omnipotence paradox debunked! Note: a variation of this on omnipotence paradox is a family related... `` can God create a flat circle where π = 3 he shook His head not in but... Create or overturnnecessary truths of logic if the being can not climb omnipotent being create a he... Drawn to the common variant of `` what happens When an unstoppable force meets an unmovable?... A wall he can not climb outcome of this universe and the logic God created for this universe pleading history... ( i.e Being. ” anything he does not defy logic DEBUNKED ) | Random Thoughts believe God maximally!

How Many Mozzarella Pearls In 8 Oz, Silver Springs Monkeys, Freck Funeral Home, Rowing Machine Seat Cushion, Family Mart Melon Pan Price, Rightline Gear Sport 2,


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

INSTAGRAM
Follow My Adventures